Sean Diddy Combs’ legal team has officially asked a federal court judge to prevent forensic clinical psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes from testifying in the ongoing legal proceedings. Dr. Hughes is known for her involvement in several high-profile cases, including her testimony on behalf of Amber Heard in the widely publicized 2022 defamation trial involving Johnny Depp.
Motion Details Revealed
According to a report by AllHipHop, a substantial 25-page motion was filed by Combs’ lawyers. The core argument of this motion is that Dr. Hughes lacks direct knowledge of the specific facts relevant to Diddy’s case. The legal team emphasizes that Dr. Hughes has reportedly not conducted any interviews with the individuals who have accused Combs. They further argue that she has not engaged in the kind of psychological evaluations that are typically expected within her profession.
Concerns About Testimony
The motion explicitly states that, “Hughes has apparently not interviewed the alleged victims at all, much less engaged in the sort of psychological diagnostics that her profession demands.” Consequently, Diddy’s attorneys contend that Dr. Hughes’ opinions are too general and speculative to be considered admissible expert testimony in the case.
Defense Attorney’s Perspective
Alex Shapiro, an attorney representing Sean Diddy Combs, has publicly stated his belief that Dr. Hughes is not offering genuine scientific analysis. Instead, Shapiro argues that she is attempting to construct a particular narrative. He further elaborated, saying, “The government wants an expert so that it can waive her testimony in summation like a magic wand to cure the glaring defects in its fact witnesses’ credibility.”
Risk of Undue Influence
Shapiro also raised concerns that allowing Dr. Hughes to testify would enable prosecutors to repeatedly reference her statements throughout the trial. He believes this could unfairly sway the jury’s opinion. Shapiro suggested that phrases such as “as Dr. Hughes told you” or “as Dr. Hughes explained” might be used frequently to bolster the prosecution’s arguments.
Questioning Coercive Control Definition
The legal motion also challenges Dr. Hughes’ definition of coercive control, a term commonly used to describe patterns of psychological abuse and manipulation. Diddy’s legal team asserts that her interpretation of this concept is overly broad and could potentially mislead the jury.
Examples of Disagreement
Specifically, Combs’ lawyers argued that under Dr. Hughes’ definition, even actions such as Combs providing financial support to his girlfriends could be misconstrued as coercion, despite not meeting the legal criteria for such behavior. They also pointed out that if Combs were to apologize, express affection, or give a gift following a disagreement, Dr. Hughes might categorize these actions as coercive control, even though they would not legally be considered as such.
Past High-Profile Cases
Dr. Hughes has a history of serving as an expert witness in several prominent legal cases. These include the sexual assault trials of Danny Masterson and Harvey Weinstein, in addition to her involvement in the defamation trial involving Amber Heard and Johnny Depp.
Concerns About Prosecution Strategy
Diddy’s legal team contends that the prosecution intends to use Dr. Hughes’ testimony to establish a general pattern of alleged abusive behavior even before other witnesses present their direct accounts. They argue that this approach indirectly suggests that Combs is guilty of the accusations against him.
Focus on Character Portrayal
According to Alex Shapiro, Dr. Hughes’ testimony appears to be more centered on portraying Combs as a violent and controlling individual rather than offering objective and reliable scientific analysis. As of April 6, 2025, the presiding judge has not yet issued a ruling on whether Dr. Hughes will be permitted to testify in the trial.
We use cookies to enhance your experience. By consenting, you allow us to process data like Browse behavior and unique IDs. Declining may affect some site features.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
