Blake Lively Uses #MeToo Law to Challenge $400 Million Defamation Suit Filed by Justin Baldoni

Blake Lively has taken a strong legal step by filing a motion to dismiss a $400 million defamation suit brought against her by Justin Baldoni. Her attorneys claim that the suit is a direct response to her earlier sexual harassment complaint. The case is now in motion as Lively’s legal team points to a California law that protects those who speak out about harassment.

Case Overview

Blake Lively’s legal team has filed a motion seeking to throw out Justin Baldoni’s defamation suit. The suit, which seeks $400 million in damages, is part of a series of legal battles stemming from claims of a smear campaign following Lively’s public accusations of sexual harassment on a film set. The film in question, titled “It Ends With Us,” sees Baldoni not only directing but also acting alongside Lively. This case has drawn significant attention due to the large sum involved and the serious nature of the allegations.

Legal Claim Details

Lively’s attorneys argue that the defamation suit is nothing more than a retaliatory action. They believe that Baldoni’s suit is intended to silence her after she came forward with her sexual harassment claim. According to her legal team, this is a misuse of the court system and a way to punish someone for speaking up about her experience. The motion to dismiss emphasizes that the legal action against Lively is an abuse of the legal process. Her team is pressing for the dismissal of the suit and seeks to have Baldoni pay for attorney fees and damages under the protection provided by a specific California law.

Use of Law

A California law, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2023, was created to protect individuals who report sexual harassment. The law came into force as a countermeasure against lawsuits that aimed to intimidate victims of harassment by claiming defamation. In her motion, Lively’s attorneys rely on this law to argue that her actions in speaking up about the harassment should not be punished by a defamation claim. They state that if the suit is dismissed, Lively is entitled to recover both legal fees and damages. This approach highlights the intent of the law to encourage victims to come forward without fear of financial ruin.

Other Motions Filed

In a related legal move, Ryan Reynolds, the husband of Blake Lively, has also submitted a motion to dismiss Baldoni’s claims. Reynolds argues that Baldoni’s statements are based on what he describes as mere “hurt feelings” and that his comments about Baldoni were within his rights. His motion supports the overall defense strategy by emphasizing that the accusations lack sufficient evidence of harm or lost work. This move by Reynolds shows that the dispute is not limited to Lively alone and involves a broader team defending their reputation and careers against claims that they say are unfounded.

Reactions and Response

Lively’s legal team, including attorneys Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson, has maintained that the defamation suit is a clear attempt to retaliate against her. A spokesperson for Lively mentioned that many women have faced similar legal challenges when speaking out about sexual harassment. The team points to the importance of the law in protecting individuals who raise concerns about their workplace experiences. They argue that the suit is part of a larger pattern of legal actions intended to silence victims rather than address genuine issues of harassment.

Justin Baldoni, on his part, has accused Lively of misusing threats and of working with the media to promote her allegations. His complaint suggests that Lively’s actions disrupted the production of the film and damaged his professional reputation. Baldoni also claims that Lively and her team pressured his agent at WME to drop him as a client, although Lively’s motion states that these allegations are not supported by enough factual evidence. The legal battle has now moved into the phase of motions where both sides are trying to have the case dismissed before proceeding to a full trial.

Court Proceedings

The case is currently under review in a California court where the judge will decide whether the defamation suit can be thrown out based on the protection offered by the state law. The outcome of this decision will likely influence similar cases in the future, especially those that involve claims related to sexual harassment and defamation. The court will have to carefully consider the arguments presented by both sides and examine the details of the California law that was designed to protect victims of harassment. It remains to be seen how the court will balance these legal principles with the allegations brought forward by Baldoni.

Next Steps and Implications

The motion to dismiss is only the beginning of what could be a long legal process. If the court dismisses the suit, it could set a precedent that shields individuals from defamation claims when they speak out about sexual harassment. On the other hand, if the suit proceeds, it may encourage further legal challenges in similar cases. Both parties are preparing for the next steps in this high-profile case, and the legal community is watching closely. The outcome may have significant implications for how defamation and harassment claims are handled in the entertainment industry.

Also Read: Hugh Jackman May Be Called to Testify Amid Legal Clash Between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni

For more updates on Blake Lively and the defamation case, tune in to Vviptimes.

SOURCE: Variety

---