Miley Cyrus faces a major legal challenge after a judge rejected her team’s bid to dismiss a copyright lawsuit over her 2023 hit “Flowers.” The case claims that the song copied parts of Bruno Mars’ hit “When I Was Your Man.” The ruling paves the way for a trial, leaving the case to be decided in court. The lawsuit was brought by Tempo Music Investments, a company that acquired catalog rights from co-writer Philip Lawrence. The legal action marks another chapter in the ongoing debate over music copyright and song similarities.
Case Background
The lawsuit began in September 2024 when Tempo Music Investments filed a claim. The company purchased the catalog rights of Philip Lawrence, one of the writers behind “When I Was Your Man.” The claim argues that the melody and structure of “Flowers” resemble those of the earlier hit. Miley Cyrus, whose song quickly became a fan favorite, tried to have the case thrown out in November 2024. The court did not accept her argument.
The legal team for Cyrus argued that Tempo did not have the right to sue. They said that the rights were bought without getting permission from all songwriters. However, the judge clarified that the company now holds an exclusive copyright interest. This means that even if other co-writers are involved, Tempo can take legal action for copyright infringement.
Court Ruling
The judge ruled that Cyrus and her legal team had a misunderstanding of the law. The court noted that the legal argument presented was based on the incorrect assumption about copyright ownership. The ruling states that Tempo Music Investments holds an “exclusive right” to the copyright, even without being the sole owner. The judge explained that a co-owner of a copyright has the right to sue for infringement on behalf of the work. This decision means the lawsuit can move forward to trial.
In a statement to Variety, attorney Alex Weingarten from Tempo expressed satisfaction with the ruling. He mentioned that his client is ready to prove their case in court. Legal representatives for Cyrus did not offer an immediate comment following the decision. The ruling highlights a key point in copyright law regarding the rights of co-owners.
Song Impact
The hit “Flowers” has had a significant impact since its release in January 2023. The song quickly became popular worldwide and enjoyed a lengthy stay at the top of the Billboard Hot 100, lasting eight consecutive weeks. The track also earned the title of Record of the Year at the 2024 Grammys. Fans and critics have noted similarities between “Flowers” and “When I Was Your Man,” which led to widespread discussion on social media platforms. The debate continues as both supporters and critics analyze the musical components of the tracks.
The success of “Flowers” boosted Miley Cyrus’s career even further. Her performance of the song has been widely shared online, and her live shows have drawn attention from media outlets around the world. The legal dispute adds another layer to the song’s legacy, as the case may set new standards for how musical influences are judged in court.
Legal Details
The key legal issue in the case is the transfer of copyright rights. Tempo Music Investments argues that by acquiring the rights from Philip Lawrence, they stepped into his shoes as a co-owner. The judge agreed with this interpretation and stated that a co-owner has the standing to sue for copyright infringement. This point is central to the lawsuit.
The ruling emphasizes that the legal right to sue does not depend on owning all the rights to the work. Instead, holding an exclusive copyright interest is enough to pursue a legal claim. The decision also clarifies that the disagreement over consent from other songwriters does not affect the company’s right to take action. This clarification is likely to influence future copyright cases in the music industry.
Industry Response
The decision has sparked conversations in the music community. Industry experts note that the ruling could have a lasting effect on how copyright issues are handled in the future. Music professionals now face the challenge of balancing creative expression with legal responsibilities. The case adds to a growing number of disputes where similarities between popular songs lead to court battles.
Fans have taken to social media to express mixed feelings about the case. Some support the idea of protecting artistic originality, while others believe that musical influences should be seen as part of a natural evolution in sound. The debate continues, and the upcoming trial will likely offer more details on the legal arguments and evidence presented by both sides.
Miley Cyrus remains at the center of attention not only because of her performance and musical style but also due to the significant legal implications of this case. The lawsuit will now proceed to trial, where both parties are expected to present detailed arguments and evidence. The decision by the court has cleared the path for these proceedings.
We use cookies to enhance your experience. By consenting, you allow us to process data like Browse behavior and unique IDs. Declining may affect some site features.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
