The legal battle between Tyra Banks and Netflix over the documentary Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model has taken a significant turn. The streaming service has officially asked a court to throw out the supermodel’s defamation lawsuit, arguing that her complaints are simply about creative disagreements rather than actual false statements.
Netflix filed the motion to dismiss on Friday, August 14, in Los Angeles Superior Court. The company also submitted an anti-SLAPP motion, which is a legal tool designed to end lawsuits that target free speech rights early in the process.
What Started the Lawsuit
Tyra Banks, 52, filed her defamation lawsuit against Netflix back in June 2026. She claimed that the documentary series Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model falsely portrayed her.
Banks sat for a long interview that lasted three-and-a-half hours. However, only about 16 minutes of her footage made it into the final cut of the documentary. She argued that the editing “stripped” her comments “of context” and “reassembled” them to support a false and damaging story.
A specific moment in the documentary caused the most concern. In one scene, Banks was asked, “You remember the story with Shandi?” referring to Shandi Sullivan, a contestant from cycle two who said she was sexually assaulted during filming. Banks responded with “um” and looked up at the ceiling before the screen cut to black. She argued that this edit created a damaging impression that she could not remember the assault.
In her court documents, Banks said the documentary created a false story that she “knowingly allowed a contestant to be sexually assaulted on her show, exploited that contestant’s trauma for ratings, and then could not even remember it when asked”. She also claimed she suffered “significant mental anguish” because of how she was shown. Banks is asking for a jury trial and unspecified money damages.
Netflix’s Argument for Dismissal
Netflix’s legal team pushed back hard against Banks’ claims. In their motion, they argued that Banks’ complaints are not about defamation but about “ordinary editorial decisions”.
“Banks understands editorial discretion. She created, hosted, and executive produced 24 seasons of ANTM, making the same kinds of editorial decisions she now attacks — what footage to include, what to omit, and how to present competing narratives,” the motion reads.
Netflix pointed out that Banks herself made similar editing choices during her time as the host and executive producer of America’s Next Top Model for 24 seasons. The company argued that the documentary simply turned that same “editorial lens” back on Banks and her show.
Related:
The streaming service also addressed the specific scene involving Shandi Sullivan. Netflix’s lawyers noted that Banks’ full response—”I do remember her story”—actually appears at the start of Episode 2.
“A documentary expressly showing Banks remembering does not imply that she forgot,” Netflix’s motion states.
Netflix also reminded the court that Banks signed an agreement after her interview. The agreement gave the filmmakers the right to edit her footage and stated that she had “no right to review or approve” the finished documentary. The agreement also released claims for defamation and false light.
Banks’ Legal Team Responds
Banks’ attorneys, Tom Clare and Clare Locke, did not stay silent. They responded to Netflix’s motion with a strong statement, arguing that the company is missing the main point of the lawsuit.
“Tyra’s lawsuit raises a simple question: can viewers trust that a documentary presented as fact fairly represents what happened and what people actually said?” the attorneys said.
“No one disputes that documentaries are edited. The question is whether those edits materially distorted the truth. This is not about Tyra being ‘dissatisfied’ with an edit, nor is it about wanting creative control. It is about whether viewers were given an accurate representation of her words and the facts.”
Banks’ lawyers also made a direct challenge to Netflix. They called on the streaming service to release the complete, unedited version of Banks’ interview.
“Netflix has Tyra’s complete, unedited interview. If Netflix stands behind the accuracy of its documentary, it should release that interview in full and let viewers judge for themselves.”
They argued that Netflix is hiding the facts by not releasing the full footage.
Netflix Stands by the Documentary
A Netflix spokesperson defended the documentary and its directors in a public statement.
“Directors Daniel Sivan and Mor Loushy are respected documentarians who thoroughly interviewed the people behind America’s Next Top Model,” the spokesperson said.
“Tyra Banks was given the opportunity to speak openly about her experience and the creators fairly presented her perspective alongside those of every other participant shown in this documentary.”
“We stand behind Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model and will continue to vigorously defend it.”
The documentary’s executive producer, Vanessa Golembewski, had previously spoken about Banks’ involvement. She told Tudum in February that Banks’ perspective was always important to the series, but her involvement was only as an interview subject. Golembewski also said that Banks “never asked to have any creative input or control” before the documentary premiered.
What Happens Next
A hearing on Netflix’s motions is currently scheduled for October 30. At that hearing, a judge will decide whether to dismiss the case or allow it to move forward. If the case continues, it could lead to a long legal process, including the discovery phase where both sides exchange evidence.
For now, both sides are standing their ground. Netflix argues that Banks is simply unhappy with how she was portrayed, while Banks and her lawyers are fighting for what they call truth and accuracy in documentary filmmaking.
Also Read: Orphan Black Leaving Netflix in September 2026: Why You Must Binge This Sci-Fi Classic Now
For more entertainment news and updates, keep reading VvipTimes for the latest stories from Hollywood.
Leave a Reply