A past comment from actor Seo Kang Joon regarding Kim Sae Ron has resurfaced, drawing attention to a stark contrast with the ongoing controversy surrounding Kim Soo Hyun. The 2016 interaction, where Seo Kang Joon corrected a joke about being a “married couple” with then-minor Kim Sae Ron, now has netizens comparing his reaction to Kim Soo Hyun’s alleged actions.
The 2016 Incident
In 2016, Seo Kang Joon and Kim Sae Ron appeared on KBS’s “Entertainment Weekly.” During the show, the interviewer made a lighthearted comment, suggesting they looked like a married couple. Seo Kang Joon quickly responded, “What do you mean married couple? She’s a minor.” At the time, Kim Sae Ron was 15 years old.
Resurfaced Amid Controversy
This exchange has gained renewed attention in light of allegations that Kim Soo Hyun began a relationship with Kim Sae Ron when she was 15 and he was 27. The age difference and the fact that Kim Sae Ron was a minor have fueled intense debate and criticism.
Netizen Reactions
Netizens are now comparing Seo Kang Joon’s response to the current situation. Many are praising his immediate correction and highlighting the inappropriateness of the interviewer’s joke.
Comments from netizens include:
“That’s the sane reaction. But the fact that she was dating an even older man in real life…f*ck.”
“Any normal, sane person would have reacted that way.”
“By the way, why is the reported saying such a thing as a joke?”
“It’s a perfectly normal reaction.”
“F*ck the reporter and the writer too.”
The age difference between Seo Kang Joon and Kim Soo Hyun has also been a point of discussion. Seo Kang Joon, born in 1993, is five years younger than Kim Soo Hyun. Netizens are also criticizing the interviewer for making such an inappropriate comment about a minor.
To know the latest developments about Seo Kang Joon, Kim Sae Ron, and Kim Soo Hyun, Keep an eye on VvipTimes, and allow notifications from us to get instant updates on your device.
Disclaimer:All data and facts presented in this article are sourced from trusted outlets believed to be accurate at the time of writing. However, we cannot guarantee 100% accuracy. For further verification, please cross-check with the sources listed below.
