Russell Brand is not “some kind of psychopath who rapes people and thinks it’s normal,” his defense lawyer told a London jury on Monday, November 2, 2026, as the comedian’s high-profile sexual assault trial moved into its final stage. Ian Winter KC, Brand’s lead barrister, made the remark during his closing speech at Southwark Crown Court, arguing that the 51-year-old entertainer genuinely believed his sexual encounters were consensual and that the case against him had been tainted by media reporting. Brand denies all charges and has pleaded not guilty to seven offences involving six women over a decade.
What the Defense Lawyer Told the Jury
Ian Winter KC spent Monday morning setting out the defense’s final case, telling jurors that a “highly promiscuous life is entirely lawful” and questioning whether they could be sure that out of the “many, many women” who had sex with Brand, he raped “just three of them”. The barrister described it as an “extremely curious feature” of the case that the women who accused Brand of rape described his behavior as “normal” afterward.
“He obviously genuinely believed that they were consenting because that’s the only thing that would explain why his behaviour was normal,” Winter told the court. “There is no evidence he is some sort of psychopath who rapes people and thinks it’s normal”.
Winter also referred to the earliest allegation, from 1999, when a woman accused Brand of rape after a performance at a fringe cabaret event during the Labour Party conference in Bournemouth. The woman told the court Brand left his email address and asked if she was enjoying herself during the alleged attack.
“You would have to be a psychopath” to be raping someone and “asking if they were enjoying it” at the same time, Winter said. “He left her his actual email address. Rapists do not give out their email address. Rapists do not leave their photographs. Rapists do not kiss their victims goodbye”.
The ‘Poisoned Well’ Argument
A central pillar of the defense’s closing speech was the claim that a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary and stories in The Times and The Sunday Times in 2023 had “poisoned the well of justice” by prompting women to come forward with allegations years later. Winter quoted an 1864 passage from philosopher John Henry Newman about “poisoning the wells” to frame his argument.
“They poisoned the wells in the hope and intention that other people come forward and make allegations against him,” Winter told jurors.
The barrister said the six complainants were “not random” and had been “thoroughly contaminated by the programme”. Winter reminded the jury that the trial judge had directed them that the documentary was “very one-sided” and “produced in a dramatic manner”. He also pointed to the “devastating effect” the fallout had on Brand personally, including an incident where a hospital would not let him visit his baby son’s bedside after life-saving open heart surgery.
‘Not a Crime to Be a Crazy Idiot’
Winter urged the jury to separate Brand’s sexual conduct from the question of criminality, telling them that being unkind or disrespectful during sex is not a crime if there is consent.
“It is not criminal to treat women unkindly before, during or after sex,” Winter said. “It is not, I am afraid, criminal to be disrespectful or rude or to act like a crazy idiot. If there is consent it is lawful”.
He added that Brand had an “immense amount of sex” but that “none of it was unlawful,” and told jurors: “Disgusting, distasteful, immoral, who cares? It’s irrelevant to your consideration”.
Winter also questioned why none of the women came forward during the MeToo movement, saying it “could not have been more publicised” and asking how “not one of them thought what happened to them involved a crime” during that period.
The Charges Brand Faces
Russell Brand, 51, faces seven charges at Southwark Crown Court: three counts of rape, three counts of sexual assault, and one count of attempted indecent assault. The allegations span a 10-year period from 1999 to 2009 and involve six women.
Brand was initially charged with indecent assault over an alleged incident involving a female MTV employee in 2001. On Tuesday, October 27, 2026, Mr Justice Bennathan ruled there was “insufficient evidence” to support that charge and directed the jury to find Brand not guilty of it. The charge was replaced with attempted indecent assault, and Brand entered a not-guilty plea to the revised count. He denies all allegations.
The Prosecution’s Case
Riel Karmy-Jones KC, lead prosecutor, delivered her closing speech on Friday, October 30, telling jurors that the six women do not know each other and had “nothing to gain — except perhaps some closure”. She rejected the defense’s claim that media reporting had unduly influenced the complainants, saying it was wrong to suggest the 2023 coverage had “such a subliminal hold on the minds of six perfectly rational women”.
“Six different women, all of whom describe a pattern of behaviour,” Karmy-Jones told the court. “How many said that he was nice, then there was a personality change, a pivot”.
The prosecutor described Brand as seeing women as “disposable” and said he felt “disdain” toward them. She told jurors that in the rape cases, Brand “just kept on going until he achieved his ultimate aim”.
Laura Brand Gives Evidence
Brand’s wife, Laura Brand, 39, gave evidence for the defense on Thursday, October 29, describing her husband as “caring, kind and a wonderful father to our children”. She told the court she fell in love with Brand after meeting in 2006 but that he found monogamy difficult and his promiscuity left her “heartbroken” when they initially split in 2007.
“She fell in love with that man in full knowledge of what he was doing,” Winter told jurors. “She married him, she bore him three children”.
The barrister argued that Laura would not have married Brand if he were “guilty as charged”. Brand arrived at court on Monday accompanied by Laura and her father, former Ryder Cup golfer Bernard Gallacher.
You May Also Like
What Happens Next
Mr Justice Bennathan told jurors they are likely to start considering their verdicts on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. The jury — made up of eight men and four women — must decide whether the prosecution has proved each remaining charge beyond reasonable doubt. No verdict has been reached.
Also Read: Laura Gallacher Calls Russell Brand an Amazing Husband at R*pe Trial; Says I Feel Very Seen by Him
Stay with VvipTimes for clear, fact-checked coverage of the stories that matter — no noise, just the news you need.
Leave a Reply