In the ongoing legal battle between South Korean entertainment company HYBE and ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin, HYBE has responded sharply to the accusations made by Jin. This response follows Jin’s recent lawsuit against several HYBE executives.

What Are the Main Accusations?

Min Hee Jin has taken legal action against HYBE, accusing the company of various misdeeds. She claims that HYBE executives have mishandled company assets and violated company policies. Specifically, Jin alleged that HYBE improperly acquired assets such as laptops and other information from ADOR. She also accused HYBE of conducting unauthorized forensic analysis on these assets and improperly accessing personal emails and documents.

HYBE’s Detailed Rebuttal

HYBE has countered these accusations with a robust denial. The company claims that Jin’s allegations are false and misleading. According to HYBE, Jin never submitted any of her company assets, such as laptops, for audits or review. The company insists that its acquisition of these assets was done without any form of coercion. Two deputy CEOs from HYBE voluntarily provided their information assets, contradicting Jin’s claims of misconduct.

HYBE has also addressed the issue of forensic analysis. During a recent court hearing for an injunction, it was clarified that no forensic analysis was conducted on a laptop that Jin had previously returned. This point is crucial because it undermines Jin’s allegations about unauthorized data access.

Email and Document Dispute

One of the central issues in the dispute is related to the handling of emails and documents. HYBE has accused Min Hee Jin of using her HYBE work email to send numerous work-related documents, including sensitive communications with a shaman, to external parties. These emails remain on HYBE’s servers and were sent to a senior official at a partner company known as Company B.

HYBE argues that Jin’s use of her work email for such communications was inappropriate and violated company policies. They claim that this information was accessed and retained in accordance with their internal procedures and legal agreements.

HYBE’s Claim on Personal Information Processing

HYBE has also pointed out that Min Hee Jin agreed to the processing of her personal information when she joined the company. This agreement is significant in the legal context, as it implies that HYBE’s actions regarding the handling of personal information were within the bounds of the initial agreement made by Jin.

The company strongly disputes Jin’s claims of false accusations and has announced plans to file a counter-suit. They intend to challenge the lawsuit filed by Jin as baseless and based on incorrect facts.

What’s Next in the Legal Battle?

The ongoing legal conflict between HYBE and Min Hee Jin has captured considerable attention, with both parties presenting strong arguments. As the legal proceedings continue, the outcome will depend on the evidence and legal arguments presented by both sides. The case highlights the complexities and high stakes involved in disputes between top executives in the entertainment industry.

HYBE’s response to Min Hee Jin’s lawsuit not only defends its practices but also sets the stage for a further legal struggle. Both sides are now preparing for the next steps in this contentious legal battle.